Crowd sourced vs centralised data for transport planning: A case study of bicycle path data in the UK

Robin Lovelace (2015). Crowd sourced vs centralised data for transport planning: A case study of bicycle path data in the UK. GIS Research UK(GISRUK). Leeds. Http://leeds. Gisruk. Org/abstracts/GISRUK2015_submission_71. pdf.
Author

Robin Lovelace

Published

January 1, 2015

Abstract
This paper compares the quality of crowd-sourced data against official datasets for transport planning. It focuses on UK cycling infrastructure to evaluate the utility of collaborative data collection in public policy.

Type: Conference Paper Venue: GIS Research UK(GISRUK). Leeds. Http://leeds. Gisruk. Org/abstracts/GISRUK2015_submission_71. pdf Year: 2015

BibTeX

Abstract

This paper compares the quality of crowd-sourced data against official datasets for transport planning. It focuses on UK cycling infrastructure to evaluate the utility of collaborative data collection in public policy.

Citation

Robin Lovelace (2015). Crowd sourced vs centralised data for transport planning: A case study of bicycle path data in the UK. GIS Research UK(GISRUK). Leeds. Http://leeds. Gisruk. Org/abstracts/GISRUK2015_submission_71. pdf.

BibTeX

@inproceedings{lovelace_crowd_2015,
    title = {Crowd sourced vs centralised data for transport planning: a case study of bicycle path data in the {UK}},
    copyright = {CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication},
    abstract = {This paper compares the quality of crowd-sourced data against official datasets for transport planning. It focuses on UK cycling infrastructure to evaluate the utility of collaborative data collection in public policy.},
    booktitle = {{GIS} {Research} {UK}({GISRUK}). {Leeds}. http://leeds. gisruk. org/abstracts/{GISRUK2015}\_submission\_71. pdf},
    author = {Lovelace, Robin},
    year = {2015},
}

Notes